N-node systems and methods for link aggregation groups (LAG)

ABSTRACT

Aspects of the present invention include an n-node link aggregation group (LAG) system comprising a set of N nodes collectively provide a logical fabric-level view that is consistent across the set of N nodes. Embodiments of the n-node system comprise a control plane mechanism to provide Layer 2 multipathing between access network devices and the core network. The n-node system provides a loop-free topology with active-active load-sharing of uplinks from access to the core.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation of and claims the prioritybenefit of co-pending and commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser.No. 14/142,296, filed on Dec. 27, 2013, entitled “N-NODE VIRTUAL LINKTRUNKING (VLT) SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT PLANE,”, which patent document isincorporated by reference herein in its entirety and for all purposes

This patent application is related in subject matter to commonly-ownedU.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/142,170, filed on Dec. 27, 2013,entitled “N-NODE VIRTUAL LINK TRUNKING (VLT) SYSTEMS AND METHODS,”,which patent document is incorporated by reference herein in itsentirety and for all purposes.

This patent application is related in subject matter to commonly-ownedU.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/142,215, filed on Dec. 27, 2013,entitled “N-NODE VIRTUAL LINK TRUNKING (VLT) SYSTEMS CONTROL PLANE,”,which patent document is incorporated by reference herein in itsentirety and for all purposes.

This patent application is also related in subject matter tocommonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/142,263, filed onDec. 27, 2013, entitled “N-NODE VIRTUAL LINK TRUNKING (VLT) SYSTEMS DATAPLANE,”, which patent document is incorporated by reference herein inits entirety and for all purposes.

This patent application is also related in subject matter tocommonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/142,362, filed onDec. 27, 2013, entitled “N-NODE VIRTUAL LINK TRUNKING (VLT) SYSTEMSFAULT MANAGEMENT,”, which patent document is incorporated by referenceherein in its entirety and for all purposes.

This patent application is also related in subject matter tocommonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/142,402, filed onDec. 27, 2013, entitled “ROUTING IN SPINE-LEAF NETWORKING SYSTEMS,”,which patent document is incorporated by reference herein in itsentirety and for all purposes.

BACKGROUND

1. Field of Invention

The present invention relates generally to data communication networksand devices, and relates more particularly to multi-chassis linkaggregation groups.

2. Description of the Related Art

As the value and use of information continues to increase, individualsand businesses seek additional ways to process and store information.One option available to users is information handling systems. Aninformation handling system generally processes, compiles, stores,and/or communicates information or data for business, personal, or otherpurposes thereby allowing users to take advantage of the value of theinformation. Because technology and information handling needs andrequirements vary between different users or applications, informationhandling systems may also vary regarding what information is handled,how the information is handled, how much information is processed,stored, or communicated, and how quickly and efficiently the informationmay be processed, stored, or communicated. The variations in informationhandling systems allow for information handling systems to be general orconfigured for a specific user or specific use such as financialtransaction processing, airline reservations, enterprise data storage,or global communications. In addition, information handling systems mayinclude a variety of hardware and software components that may beconfigured to process, store, and communicate information and mayinclude one or more computer systems, data storage systems, andnetworking systems.

As information handling systems provide increasingly more central andcritical operations in modern society, it is important that the networksare reliable. One method used to improve reliability is to provideredundant links between network devices. By employing redundant links,network traffic between two network devices that would normally beinterrupted can be re-routed to the back-up link in the event that theprimary link fails.

Although having redundant links is helpful for failover situations, itcreates network loops, which can be fatal to networks. To remove theloops, a protocol named Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) is often employed.STP is a Layer-2 protocol that runs on network devices, such as bridgesand switches, to ensure that loops are not created when there areredundant paths in the network. The result of the STP is that some linksare inactive unless a primary link fails. Thus, networks using redundantlinks with STP have links that are underutilized.

FIG. 1 depicts an example of a networking system 100 that employsSpanning Tree Protocol. Depicted in FIG. 1 is a set of networkingdevices 105A-105D that are connected to other networks devices 110A and110B (which may be access switches), which are in turn connected toother network devices 115A and 115B (which may be core switches orrouters). The network devices are connected with redundant links. Due toSTP, some of the links are active 120 and some of the links are placedinto an inactive state 125 to avoid network loops. Because many of thelinks are placed into an inactive state by the STP, the network capacityis underutilized. To address the limitations of STP, a protocol calledthe multiple spanning tree protocol (MSTP) was developed by IEEE 802.1[IEEE 802.1s]. While this protocol allows for more links to be used forforwarding, it still suffers from the limitation of having a loop-freeactive topology for any given VLAN.

However, ever increasing demands for data have required communicationnetworks to provide more throughput. Not only must networks be reliable,but they must also provide adequate bandwidth. Thus, a key area in whichcommunication networks strive to improve is in increasing capacity (datathroughput or bandwidth).

One way to increase capacity through recapturing unused network capacityinvolves the use of link aggregation. Link aggregation refers to variousmethods of aggregating network connections to increase data throughputwhile still supporting fault tolerance in case of failures. Generally,link aggregation involves grouping two or more physical data networklinks between two network devices into one logical link in which the twoor more physical network links may be treated as a single logical link.By using certain link aggregation implementations, the need for STP canbe eliminated by increasing the intelligence of network forwardingdevices, providing a non-blocking high performance network.

Initial implementation of link aggregation required that the aggregatedlinks terminate on a single switch. However, additional implementationdeveloped that allowed the links to terminate on two switches. Anexample of a mechanism used to support LAG networking across more thanone device is multi-chassis link aggregation (“MLAG”) and distributedresilient network interconnect (DRNI) [IEEE P802.1AX-REV].

MLAG is a LAG implementation in which a LAG terminates on two separatechassis or devices. A MLAG is configured such that one or more linkscomprising one LAG terminate at ports on a first device and one or morelinks comprising the same LAG terminate on a second device. The firstand second devices are configured so that they appear to the surroundingnetwork to be one logical device. At least one standard for linkaggregation has been promulgated by the Institute of Electrical andElectronic Engineers, which is contained in the IEEE 802.1AX-2008standard, which is incorporated by reference herein. However, a numberof different vendors have implemented their own versions. For example,Cisco markets EtherChannel and Port Aggregation Protocol (along with itsrelated Virtual Switching System (VSS), virtual PortChannel (vPC),Multichassis EtherChannel (MEC), and Multichassis Link Aggregation(MLAG)). Avaya markets Multi-Link Trunking (MLT), Split Multi-LinkTrunking (SMLT), Routed Split Multi-Link Trunking (RSMLT), andDistributed Split Multi-Link Trunking (DSMLT). ZTE markets “Smartgroup”and Huawei markets “EtherTrunks”. Other vendors provide similarofferings. A standard for this technology is under development in theIEEE 802.1 standards committee; the project is called distributedresilient network interconnect (DRNI).

FIG. 2 depicts an example implementation of a networking system, whichis similar to the system in FIG. 1 but which employs link aggregation.Depicted in FIG. 2 is a set of networking devices 205A-205D that areconnected to other networks devices 210A and 210B (which may be accessswitches). In the depicted example, the network devices 205A-205D areconnects such that each device 205 x has a link aggregation group (LAG)to the switches 210A and 210B. For example, network device 205A has twoport connections 220A and 220B that together form link aggregation group220, as shown in the physical view 200A of FIG. 2. To the networkdevices 205 x having such a link aggregation configuration to theswitches, the two switches 210A and 210B may be configured to appear asa single logical switch, as shown in the logical view 200B of FIG. 2.

As noted above, the two switches may optionally be configured to appearas a single logical switch. Multi-chassis link aggregationimplementation provide special links (e.g., links 205 between switch210A and switch 210B) that can be used to connect two separate switchestogether to form an aggregation switch that in some ways acts like asingle larger chassis. With two chassis aggregated in this manner, whena packet arrives at one of the switches that must egress on the otherswitch, the first switch forwards the packet to a port associated withthe special link interconnect where it is transmitted to the otherdevice for transmission over the network.

It must be noted, however, that the current various implementations oflink aggregation have serious limitations. First, the currentimplementations support only two switches configurations connected in apoint-to-point fashion. Extending beyond two switches significantly addscomplexity in connections, configuration, and operation. For example, itis relatively simple to synchronize data between two devices, but itbecomes significantly more complex to synchronize between multipledevices.

Second, at any point in time, within a given aggregation switch only oneswitch typically operates in a primary switch role, while the remainingswitch operates in a secondary role. In the primary role, the primaryswitch assumes control over at least some of the aggregation switchfunctionality. Among other things, this can involve the primary switchbeing responsible for running some Layer-2 network protocols (such asSpanning Tree Protocol (STP)) that assist in the operation of the switchin the network environment. The network information learned by theprimary switch can be distributed as needed to the secondary switches inorder to synchronize at least some of the states between the primaryswitch and secondary switch. While running in such as primary-secondaryconfiguration is easy to manage, it does not efficiently utilize networkresources.

Third, limiting the number of switches that form the logical switchgroup does not provide a readily scalable solution. Clients desiring toadd infrastructure incrementally need to add pairs of devices ratherthan simply being able to add any number of switches. Also, clientswanting to extend their current link aggregation system cannot do sobecause new each switch or pair of switches forms a new domain ratherthan simply extending an existing domain. Thus, increasing the systeminvolves adding separate link aggregation switch groups that must beseparately managed, configured, and operated—needlessly addingcomplexity and administrative overhead.

Fourth, when pairing switches, vendors generally require that thedevices be the same. Having mirrored devices makes it easier for vendorsbecause it limits possible combinations; a vendor therefore does nothave to make sure different products interoperate. Also, havinghomogeneous devices tend to force symmetry in the configuration, forwhich it is also simpler for vendors to develop and support. However,requiring like switches is rarely the best for clients. As data centersand networks grow, a client would prefer to purchase a single new modeldevice rather than being forced to choose between buying an older modelto pair with its current older model or to buy two new models and shelveit current older, but still operational, model. Thus, currentmulti-chassis link systems inhibit cost effective equipment migrationplans.

Accordingly, what is needed are systems and methods that can address thedeficiencies and limitations of the current multi-chassis linkaggregation approaches.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Reference will be made to embodiments of the invention, examples ofwhich may be illustrated in the accompanying figures, in which likeparts may be referred to by like or similar numerals. These figures areintended to be illustrative, not limiting. Although the invention isgenerally described in the context of these embodiments, it should beunderstood that it is not intended to limit the spirit and scope of theinvention to these particular embodiments. These drawings shall in noway limit any changes in form and detail that may be made to theinvention by one skilled in the art without departing from the spiritand scope of the invention.

FIG. 1 depicts an example of a networking system that employs SpanningTree Protocol.

FIG. 2 depicts an example implementation of a networking system which issimilar to that system in FIG. 1 but which employs link aggregation.

FIG. 3 depicts an example of an N-Node VLT system according toembodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 4 depicts another example of an N-Node VLT system according toembodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 5 depicts a logical view of an N-Node VLT system according toembodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 6 depicts a high level view of a node in an N-Node VLT systemaccording to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 7A depicts a fabric management plane configuration system and theflow of information from the external/remote management client throughto individual switch network OS components in an N-Node VLT systemaccording to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 7B depicts an alternative fabric management system according toembodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 7C depicts yet another alternative fabric management systemaccording to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 8 depicts a general system and methodology of performing at leastsome of the above-listed items according to embodiments of the presentinvention.

FIG. 9 depicts a general system and at least some of the functionalityperformed by an ICL/VLT manager according to embodiments of the presentinvention.

FIG. 10 depicts a Layer 2/Layer 3 unicast packet walk-through accordingto embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 11 depicts Layer 2 broadcast packet walk-through according toembodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 12 depicts IP multicast packet flows according to embodiments ofthe present invention.

FIG. 13 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system 1300according to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 14 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system 1400according to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 15 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system 1500according to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 16 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system 1600according to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 17 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system 1700according to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 18 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system 1800according to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 19 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system 1900according to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 20 depicts a method for handling a VLT LAG in an N-Node VLT systemaccording to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 21 depicts a method for handling ICL link failure in an N-Node VLTsystem according to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 22 depicts a method for handling node failure in an N-Node VLTsystem according to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 23 depicts a block diagram of an exemplary information handlingsystem node according to embodiments of the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In the following description, for purposes of explanation, specificexamples and details are set forth in order to provide an understandingof the invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in theart that the invention may be practiced without these details. Wellknown process steps may not be described in detail in order to avoidunnecessarily obscuring the present invention. Other applications arepossible, such that the following examples should not be taken aslimiting. Furthermore, one skilled in the art will recognize thataspects of the present invention, described herein, may be implementedin a variety of ways, including software, hardware, firmware, orcombinations thereof.

Components, or modules, shown in block diagrams are illustrative ofexemplary embodiments of the invention and are meant to avoid obscuringthe invention. It shall also be understood that throughout thisdiscussion that components may be described as separate functionalunits, which may comprise sub-units, but those skilled in the art willrecognize that various components, or portions thereof, may be dividedinto separate components or may be integrated together, includingintegrated within a single system or component. It should be noted thatfunctions or operations discussed herein may be implemented ascomponents or modules.

Furthermore, connections between components within the figures are notintended to be limited to direct connections. Rather, data between thesecomponents may be modified, re-formatted, or otherwise changed byintermediary components (which may or may not be shown in the figure).Also, additional or fewer connections may be used. It shall also benoted that the terms “coupled” or “communicatively coupled” shall beunderstood to include direct connections, indirect connections throughone or more intermediary devices, and wireless connections.

In the detailed description provided herein, references are made to theaccompanying figures, which form a part of the description and in whichare shown, by way of illustration, specific embodiments of the presentinvention. Although these embodiments are described in sufficient detailto enable one skilled in the art to practice the invention, it shall beunderstood that these examples are not limiting, such that otherembodiments may be used, and changes may be made without departing fromthe spirit and scope of the invention.

Reference in the specification to “one embodiment,” “preferredembodiment,” “an embodiment,” or “embodiments” means that a particularfeature, structure, characteristic, or function described in connectionwith the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of theinvention and may be in more than one embodiment. Also, such phrases invarious places in the specification are not necessarily all referring tothe same embodiment or embodiments. It shall be noted that the use ofthe terms “set” and “group” in this patent document shall include anynumber of elements. Furthermore, it shall be noted that methods oralgorithms steps may not be limited to the specific order set forthherein; rather, one skilled in the art shall recognize, in someembodiments, that more or fewer steps may be performed, that certainsteps may optionally be performed, and that steps may be performed indifferent orders, including being done some steps being doneconcurrently. Any headings used herein are for organizational purposesonly and shall not be used to limit the scope of the description or theclaims.

The present invention relates in various embodiments to devices,systems, methods, and instructions stored on one or more non-transitorycomputer-readable media involving the communication of data overnetworks that include multi-chassis link aggregation. Such devices,systems, methods, and instructions stored on one or more non-transitorycomputer-readable media can result in, among other advantages, betterbandwidth usage, better scalability, and better reliability bymitigating the effects of down links and other points of failure acrossdata networks. In embodiments, a multi-chassis link aggregation mayprovide a group of links across multiple devices that is operated as asingle link with respect to a given client device. This may beaccomplished at least in part through the use of synchronizing orcross-referencing identifiers with respect to various devices, ports,and other items associated with multi-chassis link aggregation of thepresent invention. Such identifiers may be set forth in (by way ofillustration and not limitation) layer-2 tables, layer-3 tables, orboth.

The terms “packet” or “frame” shall be understood to mean a group ofbits that can be transported across a network. The term “frame” shallnot be interpreted as limiting embodiments of the present invention toLayer 2 networks; and, the term “packet” shall not be interpreted aslimiting embodiments of the present invention to Layer 3 networks. Theterms “packet,” “frame,” “data,” or “data traffic” may be replaced byother terminologies referring to a group of bits, such as “datagram” or“cell.” One skilled in the art shall recognize that references herein toMedia Access Control (MAC) address may, depending upon context, refer toMAC-VLAN combination.

It shall be noted that in the examples and embodiments provided hereinthe virtual link trunkings (VLTs), their members, the N-Node VLT system,and their configuration are provided for purposes of illustration andshall not be used to limit the present invention.

It shall also be noted that although embodiments described herein may bewithin the context of multi-chassis link aggregation, the inventionelements of the current patent document are not so limited. Accordingly,the invention elements may be applied or adapted for use in othercontexts.

1. Introduction

Embodiments of the present invention involve N-Node virtual linktrunking (VLT) systems and methods—thereby allowing more than just twonetwork devices to form a virtual link domain. In embodiments, a set ofN nodes can collectively provide a single logical node view to one ormore layer-2 (L2) LAGs that it presents to the outside nodes. Inembodiments, all the nodes of the N-Node VLT system are connected witheach other in full mesh (logical or physical) fashion.

In embodiments, the N-Node VLT system feature comprises a control planemechanism to provide layer-2 multi-pathing between or among accessnetwork devices (switches or servers), between or among the corenetwork, or both. In embodiments, the N-Node VLT system provides aloop-free topology with active-active load-sharing of uplinks fromaccess to the core. Currently, Spanning Tree Protocols are commonly usedfor loop prevention in layer 2 networks. The challenge with SpanningTree Protocols is that spanning trees block links to avoid loopsresulting in less than optimum link utilization and are also difficultto manage and troubleshoot. Also, network convergence times are highwith spanning trees. An N-Node VLT system eliminates the disadvantage ofSTP (active-standby links) by allowing LAG terminations on multipleseparate distribution or core switches and also supporting a loop-freetopology. Some other benefits of a VLT system include higher resiliency,improved link utilization, improved scalability, and improvedmanageability of the network.

As will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, an N-Node VLTsystem has several other benefits. One benefit is that it allows asingle device to use a LAG across multiple upstream devices. Second, anN-Node VLT system eliminates Spanning Tree Protocol blocked ports.Third, an N-Node VLT system provides a loop-free topology. Fourth, anN-Node VLT system is capable of using all available uplink bandwidth.Fifth, an N-Node VLT system provides fast convergence if either a linkor a device fails. Sixth, an N-Node VLT system provides link-levelresiliency. Seventh, an N-Node VLT system assures high availability.Eight, since the system can scale to any number of nodes, N, it is muchmore scalable and flexible than previous VLT systems. And ninth, becausethe N-Node VLT system acts effectively as a virtual switch, it can beused as a chassis replacement. One skilled in the art shall recognizeother advantages.

FIG. 3 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system accordingto embodiments of the present invention. Depicted in FIG. 3 are fournodes N1, N2, N3, and N4, which form a 4-node VLT system 320. Thus, inembodiments, an N-Node VLT system is a set of nodes that togetherprovide a logical single node view to a L2 LAG that is connected to thenodes outside of this system. In embodiments, an N-Node VLT system maybe identified by a VLT domain identifier (e.g., VLT Domain ID 1 (320) inFIG. 3).

In embodiments, the nodes need not be configured identically. Thus, forexample, N1 and N2 may be configured as L3 switches. It shall bereiterated that these are example configurations and shall not be usedto limit the scope of the present patent document.

In forming the N-Node VLT system, the nodes are connected via aplurality of links 325. These links may be referred to as inter-nodelinks (INL), inter-chassis links (ICLs), or Virtual Link Trunk Interface(VLTI)—which terms may be used interchangeably herein. These links maybe used to connect nodes together to form the N-Node VLT system that, inat least some ways acts, with other network devices as a single largerchassis. In embodiments, the INL links together form a mesh 325. Asshown in the embodiment depicted in FIG. 3, the nodes (N1-N4) areconnected in a full mesh. While the depicted embodiment is a physicalfull mesh, it shall be noted that the nodes may be in a logical fullmesh. For example, other topologies (such as ring, daisy chain, tree,etc.) may be used but logically the nodes may be configured to be fullmesh. One skilled in the art shall recognize that tunneling and/or othermethods may be employed to achieve a logical full mesh. In alternativeembodiments, the nodes may not be in a physical or logical full meshconfiguration but may employ an alternative configuration. In forming asingle logical node, the INL links may be considered analogous tobackplane technology for a chassis switch; however, as will be explainedin more detail below, unlike typical backplane data transfermethodologies that push much of the data traffic to the backplane,embodiment of the present invention attempt to reduce or even minimizethe amount of data transmitted via the INL links.

By way of nomenclature when discussing the connection between nodes, theformat “ICL(Nx-Ny)” may be used. “ICL(Nx-Ny)” means the inter-node linkconnecting nodes Nx and Ny. For example, ICL(N1-N4) is the link thatconnects node N1 with node N4, namely link 330 in FIG. 3.

Also depicted in FIG. 3 are VLT LAGs. In embodiments, a VLT LAG is a setof links that an external node uses to connect to the N-Node VLT system.To the external node this appears as a single L2 LAG. For example, asshown in FIG. 3, external node E2 310-2 has four links that togetherform a VLT LAG, namely VLT2 315-2. It shall be noted that the LAG mayhave links terminating on multiple nodes of the N-Node VLT system, as isthe case for node E2, which connects to each of the four VLT nodesN1-N4. It shall also be noted that a node may have multiple links to thesame node.

Thus, depicted in FIG. 3 are a number of virtual link trunks—VLT1, VLT2,and VLT3. The VLT1 comprises node N3 and N4 as members. Similarly, VLT2comprises all nodes as its members. And, VLT3 has node N2 as its onlymember. Links 315-4 and 315-5 in FIG. 3 are layer-3 (L3) interfaces fromdevice E4 and are connected to node N2. It should be noted that networkdevices E1-E4 may be top-of-rack switches, servers, switches, or somecombination thereof.

Concerning representing VLT membership, the format VLTx {Na, . . . Nr}may be used. In embodiments, this format indicates that VLTx is a VLTLAG that has links which are up, active, and terminating on nodes Na, .. . , and Nr of the N-Node VLT system. For example, turning to FIG. 3,VLT2 membership may be represented as VLT2 {N1, N2, N3, N4}, which showsthat VLT2 is a VLT LAG and has active links terminating on nodes N1, N2,N3, and N4 of the N-Node VLT system. Similarly, VLT3 may be representedat VLT3 {N2} since VLT3 has node N2 as its only member.

Additional important concepts to the operation of embodiments of theN-Node VLT system are “Local Exit” and “Assigned Node.” In embodimentsof the VLT system, it is preferred that traffic not be communicated viaICL links unless necessary. Thus, if traffic ingress on the VLT systemon node Nx is destined for VLTz, and if that VLT has a link on node Nx,the traffic should egress through that link. It shall be noted that ifthe VLT has multiple links terminating on Nx, the data may be LAGdistributed amongst those links.

In embodiments, a node may be assigned or designated as the node forprocessing certain traffic flow(s). Consider, by way of illustration,the following examples. In embodiments, if traffic ingresses on theN-Node VLT system on node Nx and is destined for VLTz, and if that VLThas no link on node Nx then there is no local exit. Assuming that VLTzhas links on one or more of the other nodes in the VLT system, then oneof those nodes may be designated as the assigned node for traffic forthat VLT, and the traffic will be sent to that node and then send toVLTz. It shall be noted that, in embodiments, an assigned node may bespecified for a “class” of traffic (e.g., for different Layer 3interfaces in which different assigned nodes may be chosen for loadbalancing or other reasons). It shall also be noted that, inembodiments, the “class” of traffic may be differentiated based uponsource or flow.

Consider, by way of illustration, VLT network 400 with its four-node(N1, N2, N3, and N4) VLT system 420. As shown in FIG. 4, assume that avirtual link trunk, VLT1 415-1, comprises node members N1 405-1 and N4405-4 (i.e., VLT1 {N1, N4}), then the following are illustrativeexamples of possible assigned node according to embodiments of thepresent invention:

N1 may be designated as the assigned node for the traffic ingressing onnode N2 that is destined to VLT1 (i.e., Assigned-Node {N2−VLT1}=>N1);and

N4 may be designated as the assigned node for the traffic ingressing onnode N3 that is destined to VLT1 (i.e., Assigned-Node {N3−VLT1}=>N4).

In embodiments, the assigned node may all be assigned the same node ordifferent nodes based upon the VLTx membership and one or more loaddistribution algorithms

In embodiments, an N-Node VLT system may be configured with a Layer 3(L3) interface. One of ordinary skill in the art shall recognize thatthis is similar to orphan ports used in a 2-Node VLT system. Inembodiments, the Layer 3 interface terminates on a single node of theN-Node VLT system. Consider, by way of illustration, the network system300 in FIG. 3. Note that network device N4 310-4 has two L3 interfaces315-4 and 315-5 that connect to VLT node 2 305-2.

In embodiments, the N-Node VLT system 320 may include a virtual localarea network (VLAN) for the node system, which may be referred to hereinas an ICL-VLAN. In embodiments, an ICL-VLAN is a special internal L2 orL3 VLAN created by the N-Node VLT and all the ICL ports may be mademembers of that VLAN.

In embodiments, an N-Node VLT system may comprise a VLT topology changeowner. Thus, in embodiments, one of the nodes may own the responsibilityof assigning owners for table entries since the current owner may not beeligible to own the entry after a topology change.

In embodiments, an N-Node VLT system may comprise pre-computed updatesand actions. In embodiments, an N-Node VLT system may use distributedcomputing to react to a topology change. Consider, by way ofillustration, the following example. In the event of an ICL failure, aVLT node may not be able to get topology information from all the nodesof the VLT system. In such cases, the partly isolated node will not beable to communicate with all the nodes to take the appropriate actionfor the topology change. So, pre-computed updates and actions may alwaysbe computed by all the nodes for possible future ICL failures.

2. N-Node VLT Logical View

FIGS. 3 and 4 depicted examples of physical views of N-Node VLT systems.An important aspect of embodiments of the N-Node VLT system is itslogical representation, particularly as it appears to other layers inthe network. FIG. 5 depicts a logical view of an N-Node VLT systemaccording to embodiments of the present invention. For purposes ofillustration, the example logical representation of FIG. 5 generallycorrelates to the physical view depicted in FIG. 3.

Depicted in FIG. 5 are three levels or layers: a management level 505that may utilize a fabric command line interface (CLI) or some otherfabric management interface; a fabric or domain level logical componentslayer 510; and a node level 515.

As shown in FIG. 5, the association of VLT #n with LAG #n of itsVLT-member nodes is shown with solid lines. For example, VLT #1comprises LAG #1 of Node #1, LAG #1 of Node #3, and LAG #1 of Node #4.In the depicted embodiment, the VLAN members of a VLAN #n are shown bygrouping them inside a dashed block for the VLAN. For example, VLT #1525and VLT #3530 are members of VLAN #1535. It shall be noted that VLANsand VLTs may have a many-to-many relationship depending uponconfiguration. For example, in FIG. 5, note that VLT #1 is a member ofVLAN #1 and is also a member of VLAN #2.

Also depicted in FIG. 5 is the component stack for each node. Forexample, the component stack for Node #1 is depicted as vertical stack520. Note that the fabric/domain level logical components 510 span allthe nodes.

The logical view depicts the hierarchical relationship between themodules and their level (i.e., Node level, Fabric Level, or ManagementLevel). In embodiments, the hierarchy of the logical components may bedescribed as follows.

a. At the Node Level

In embodiments, certain configurations occur at the node level. Forexample, in embodiments, the ports and LAGs are configured for a node.Thus, ports may be grouped into LAGs within a node. For example, Port #1and Port #2 are configured as members of LAG #1 in Node #4. Inembodiments, the IP addresses and routing instances may also beconfigured at the node level.

b. At the Domain/Fabric Level

One of the key aspects of the N-Node VLT system is the abstraction thatoccurs at the domain or fabric level. By have this abstraction andsharing information among nodes in the domain level, the domain levelacts as glue or middleware layer between the other levels. An additionalbenefit to this configuration is that little, if any, changes need tooccur at the node level 515 and the fabric management level 505 tosupport N-Node VLT functionality.

At the domain or fabric level, the logical components comprise theVLT(s), VLAN(s), and the layer 3 (L3) interface(s), and the domainnumbers for these items are shared across the nodes that participate inthe VLT domain. This helps enable the nodes to be seen as one entity tothe node level 515 and the fabric management level 505, but still allowsthe nodes to be loosely coupled such that one node's failure does notadversely affect the others.

Thus, it should be noted that, in embodiments, while referring to theports and LAGs, the node should be mentioned to identify them uniquely.This condition applies to all node level components. However, the VLTand VLAN components do not require node ID to identify them uniquely.This condition applies to all fabric level components (e.g., VLT, VLAN,and L3 interface).

As shown in FIG. 5, in embodiments, a LAG or LAGs from nodes form a VLTLAG, and the ICL links between the nodes provide mesh connectivity,which is preferably full logical or physical mesh connectivity. Aspreviously noted, in embodiments, the VLTs may be configured to bemembers of specific VLANs. In embodiments, the ICL links are configuredas member of all VLANs defined in the VLT system.

In embodiments, one or more interfaces to a node may be configured as L3interfaces. To provide resiliency for L3 forwarding, in embodiments, anICL-VLAN may be created and all the ICL ports may be configured to bemembers of that VLAN.

In embodiments, one or more nodes may include a routing instance. Inembodiments, a node that does not have any L3 interfaces (excludingICL-VLAN) need not have a routing instance.

It shall be noted that, while it is possible to have routing instancesfor all the nodes, it is not necessary. In embodiments, it is beneficialto have routing instances in two nodes of a VLT system for redundancy.FIG. 5 depict an embodiment in which routing instances (routing instance#1540 and routing instance #2545) operate in two nodes (Node #1 and Node#2, respectively) of an N-Node VLT system 500. Since, in embodiments,the two routing instances exist at the same IP interface, they both havethe same view of the network space and are, effectively, parallelrouting. In embodiments, additional routing instances may exist on othernodes (e.g., routing instances #3550 and #4555).

In the depicted embodiment of FIG. 5 that comprises two routinginstances (routing instance #1540 and routing instance #2545), all VLANsmay participate in these two routing instances. In embodiments, one ofthe two nodes with a routing instance may be identified as primary node.In embodiments, both the nodes synchronize their forwarding informationbase (FIB) table entries wherever applicable, and the primary node mayprovide the complete FIB table to other nodes which do not have arouting instance. Then, in case of a primary node failure, a secondarynode may assume the role of primary node.

In embodiments, a fabric manager may use the ICL as a fabric to exchangeVLT control packets among the other nodes. From a VLT control planepoint of view, the ICL mesh appears like a fabric to reach all thenodes.

As these components work across the nodes, the fabric level componentsare able to configure the switch to handle various failure conditionsand take appropriate action.

3. N-Node VLT Switch High Level Design

Turning now to FIG. 6, depicted is a high level view of a switch designas a node in an N-Node VLT system according to embodiments of thepresent invention. The N-Node VLT functionality may be implementedwithin a node 605 via the addition of a fabric manager 610, an ICL/VLTprotocol module 615, and an ICL/VLT manager 620 with existing modules.By way of illustration and not limitation, the fabric manager may bepart of a Force10 Operating System (FTOS) fabric manager, which isavailable from Dell Force10 of San Jose, Calif. In embodiments, thesemodules 610, 615, and 620 interact with existing L2/L3 protocol modulesand table management modules via existing and/or extended moduleinterfaces, as is well known to those of ordinary skill in the art.Those existing modules include, but are not necessarily limited to:interface manager (IFM), interface (IF) agent, Address ResolutionProtocol manager (ARPM), Forwarding Information Base (FIB) agent,Routing Table Manager (RTM), Layer 2 manger, IP Multicast manager,Access Control List (ACL) manager (ACLM), ACL agent, and chip layermanager(s). The functionality of the fabric manager 610, the ICLprotocol module 615, and the ICL/VLT manager 620 are explained in moredetail below.

4. Fabric Management Plane

In embodiments, a fabric management plane provides a centralizedmanagement interface for the entire cluster of the N-Node VLTdeployment.

In embodiments, this is achieved by having a single switch fabric masteraccessible via a virtual IP address (VIP) and N−1 fabric standby nodes.The fabric master is responsible for providing the external managementinterfaces (CLI, REST, etc.) that are used by third-party managementapplications and clients.

In embodiments, the fabric master may support the following functions:(1) Fault, Configuration, Monitoring, Security and Logging; (2) Databasesynchronization with fabric standby nodes; (3) Transaction-basedconfiguration with commit/rollback capability across all the nodes inthe fabric cluster; (4) Take a single fabric level configurationtransaction and break it down into multiple configuration requests toall the applicable nodes in the cluster (uses existing node levelCLI/REST interfaces); (5) Single point of management for the entirefabric cluster via Virtual IP address; and (6) Election mechanism toidentify the node in the cluster that is best suited to be master. Oneskilled in the art shall recognize that the fabric manager may supportfewer or more functions.

Concerning election, one skilled in the art shall recognize that anumber of election mechanisms may be employed, which may include nodesin an n-node VLT system negotiating who is to be master (or an owner)based upon one or more criteria. For example, in embodiments, nodes maynegotiate who is master based upon a hierarchy of criteria in which thenode with the highest priority ID is selected. If nodes have the samepriority ID or no priority ID, then selection may be based upon MACaddress (e.g., lowest MAC address is selected). And, in embodiments, ifthe nodes have the same MAC address (such as a virtual MAC) then thefirst node that is operational may be selected. Also, in embodiments, ifa node has two or more controller cards, it may internally negotiatewhich should be the master; and if need be, after having selected anintra-node master, negotiate with external nodes to decide a masterbetween the nodes.

In embodiments, from the user's perspective the following VLT fabricentities are configurable to setup an N-Node VLT system:

TABLE 1 ENTITY IDENTIFIER CONFIGURATION PARAMETER Domain Domain IDSystem MAC Nodes Node ID Priority, Management Port ID & its IPaddress/Mask, Default Route Port-Channels Port Channel ID List of Ports,Type (ICL/VLT), Mode (Trunk, Access), List of Ports, List of VLANs ICLsICL ID Node Pair, Port Channel ID VLTs VLT ID List of Ports, PortChannel ID

FIG. 7A depicts a fabric management plane configuration system and theflow of information from the external/remote management client throughto individual switch network OS components 720 in an N-Node VLT systemaccording to embodiments of the present invention. FIG. 7A shows amanagement client 725 that is communicatively coupled to an N-Node VLTsystem to provide fabric-level management capabilities. Also depict inFIG. 7A are a plurality of nodes (for sake of brevity only two nodes(705-M and 705-S) are illustrated) of the N-Node VLT system. Inembodiments, each node includes an embedded fabric management clientcomponent (710), a command line interface (CLI)/Representational StateTransfer (REST) module 715 that interfaces with the fabric managementclient module 710, and switch operating system (OS) components 720 thatinterface with the CLI/REST module 715. In embodiments, the OScomponents may be existing OS components, such as those provided in theForce10 Operating System (FTOS) by Dell Force10 of San Jose, Calif.(although other network operating systems or components may be used).Similarly, the CLI/REST module may be an existing CLI/REST module ormodules. It shall be noted that, in embodiments, node-level API requestsmay leverage existing node-level APIs to minimize the amount of workrequired at the fabric management plane.

In embodiment, the management client 725 is used by anadministrator/user to interface 740 with the fabric management plane toconfigure the N-Node VLT system with the VLT fabric level configurationparameters (e.g., Table 1 (above)).

In embodiments, one node (e.g., node 705-M) operates with a fabricmaster client 710-M and one or more of the remaining nodes contain afabric standby client 710-S (e.g., node 705-S). The standby clients maybe used for failover protection; thus, if the node 705-M upon which thefabric master 710-M operates fails, another node (e.g., node 705-S) maybecome the master, thereby providing limited or no interruption. Inembodiments, the fabric master may be assigned a virtual IP address;thus, changes as to which node in the VLT system is acting as the fabricmaster will appear transparent.

In embodiments, the fabric management plane takes external user requeststhat are received at the fabric master 710-M and uses a singledistributed transaction to invoke the node(s) level applicationprogramming interfaces (APIs) (command line interface (CLI)/CustomerRepresentational State Transfer (REST) (e.g., 715-x) in parallel topropagate the request across the cluster of nodes.

In embodiments, once the transaction is completed successfully, thefabric master 710-M will synchronize the new set of changes to all thefabric standby nodes (e.g., cluster-level database synchronization). Inembodiments, the configuration changes will only be implemented once theconfiguration is successfully updated in each node's database. Inalternative embodiments, the fabric management system may flag problemsthat affect the N-Node VLT system and may additionally provide alerts tosuch issues to the user/administrator.

In embodiments, the fabric management plane interface may additionallyallow a user or administrator the ability to configure node-specificelements on one or more of the nodes in the N-Node VLT system.

It shall be noted that, in embodiments, the configuration of FIG. 7A maybe adapted for or implemented as a distributed fabric configuration. Inembodiments, all nodes are equal and any node may provide managementinterface. Thus, in embodiments, a “master” node may be the nodeperforming a certain transaction. For example, a “master” node is a nodeperforming a user transaction; and, in embodiments, different nodes mayperform different user transactions—at different times, in parallel, orboth. However, fabric-level configuration information is kept consistentand distributed to every node in the domain.

FIG. 7B depicts an alternative fabric management system according toembodiments of the present invention. From a system perspective, theconfiguration parameters (e.g., Table 1) may be converted into the nodelevel and fabric level parameters. In embodiments, the node levelparameters may be configured by configuration management server, such as(by way of illustration and not limitation) NETCONF, through amanagement interface (e.g., 740) of the node. It shall be noted thatthese nodes are able to act independently as peer nodes.

In embodiments, the client (710) of the nodes maintains the session withthe configuration management server (750) through the managementinterface. The client decodes the configuration data and protocolmessages and configures the node through the existing CLI moduleinterface 715.

FIG. 7C depicts yet another alternative fabric management systemaccording to embodiments of the present invention. It shall be notedthat, in embodiments, existing products, such as (by way of example andnot limitation) Active Fabric Manager supplied by Dell Force10 of SanJose, Calif. may be used with an N-Node VLT system as a configurationmanagement server. In embodiments, the fabric manager 770 configures thenode level parameters through the existing CLI module interfacedirectly, and the fabric level parameters may be configured by CLIcontrol plane.

5. Control Plane a. Fabric Manager

In embodiments, a fabric manager 510 implements control plane capabilitythat works across all the nodes in an N-Node VLT system to realize anddistribute the current topology among all the nodes. It shall be notedthat, depending upon embodiment, each node's fabric manager actsindependently and distributes and receives forwarding and link/VLT levelinformation as needed. And, in such embodiments, when an explicitsynchronization is required, a node acts as a primary. In embodiments, afabric manager 510 of one node communicates with the fabric manager ofother node using ICL links.

In embodiments, the ICL links provide full mesh (either physical orlogical) connectivity. With the complete knowledge of the currenttopology, a fabric manager is able to ascertain the assigned nodes andport block masks for the nodes. In embodiments, apart from distributingthe table entries to all the nodes, a fabric manager may also changesthe owner of the table entries, when there is a topology change.

With hello messages, a fabric manager is able to recognize an ICL linkfailure and takes appropriate corrective action according to embodimentsof the present invention. Upon recognizing node failure, the fabricmanager makes appropriate updates to necessary nodes.

For L3 unicast and multicast support, in embodiments, a fabric manageror other control modules use ICL-VLAN or other spanning VLANs as a meansto send the packet from one node to other node to complete L3 forwardingor replication.

Thus, in embodiments, the fabric manager may be responsible for thefollowing areas:

-   -   Building current ICL topology;    -   Setup port block masks;    -   Distributing L2/L3 unicast table updates;    -   Distributing L2/L3 multicast table updates;    -   Pre-compute updates for handling failure scenarios;    -   Communicate with other nodes;    -   Maintain ICL mesh;    -   Table entry ownership and aging of entries;    -   Identify ICL Failure and Node Failure;    -   Electing topology-change-owner; and    -   Load Balancing.

It shall be noted that, in embodiments, the fabric manager may do moreor fewer of the above-listed items. FIG. 8 depicts a general system andmethodology of performing at least some of the above-listed itemsaccording to embodiments of the present invention.

Depicted in FIG. 8 is a fabric manager 810 communicatively coupled to anICL/VLT manager 820 that is communicatively coupled with othernetworking components, which are collectively depicted as existingcomponent 825. In embodiments, the fabric manager 810 makes one or morerequests (830) of the ICL/VLT manager 820 to obtain changes and updateinformation. For example, the ICL/VLT manager 820 interfaces with theother networking components (such as those depicted in FIG. 6) to obtainstate changes and updates. In embodiments, this information is in turnprovided (835) from the ICL/VLT manager 820 to the fabric manager 810 ofthe node 805. In embodiments, the fabric manager updates its localdatabase(s) and modifies table entries, if necessary. The fabricmanager, in embodiments, communicates this update information to othernodes in the N-Node VLT system, thereby providing a consistentconfiguration for all the nodes.

The functionalities performed by the fabric manager, according toembodiments, are provided in more detail below. To aid the explanation,consider (by way of example and not limitation) the topology depicted inFIG. 3. The topology of the N-Node VLT system in FIG. 3 may berepresented by the following tables:

VLT membership List Assigned Node List VLT-to-ICL Map VLT1 {N1, N3, N4}Assigned-Node At N2: Map VLT1 {N2 − VLT1} => N1 to ICL(N1 − N2) VLT2{N1, N2, N3, N4} Assigned-Node At N1: Map VLT3 {N1 − VLT3} => N2 toICL(N1 − N2) VLT3 {N2} Assigned-Node At N3: Map VLT3 {N3 − VLT3} => N2to ICL(N2 − N3) Assigned-Node At N4: Map VLT3 to {N4 − VLT3} => N2ICL(N2 − N4)

Initial Common Egress Mask Specific Egress Mask For all Nodes, At N1:Ingress from ICL(N2 − N1) allowed on VLT1 Ingress from any ICL is At N2:Ingress from ICL(N1 − N2) denied on other ICLs allowed on VLT3 Ingressfrom any ICL is At N2: Ingress from ICL(N3 − N2) denied on any VLTallowed on VLT3 At N2: Ingress from ICL(N4 − N2) allowed on VLT3

i. Building Current Topology VLT Membership List

In embodiments, the fabric manager 810 receives notification (e.g.,notification step 835) on port state change from its local ICL/VLTmanager 820 as an ICL/VLT message. With this notification, it updatesits node-specific VLT membership list and distributes (e.g., update 845)the node-specific VLT membership list with all other nodes throughICL/VLT message.

In embodiments, the fabric manager may also request VLT membershiplist(s) from other nodes by sending an ICL/VLT message with request forVLT membership list. The nodes respond to this request by sending theirnode-specific VLT membership lists. With these responses, the fabricmanager builds a system-wide VLT membership list.

In embodiments, with node-specific VLT membership lists being receivedfrom all nodes, the fabric manager can update its system-wide VLTmembership list.

ii. Building Current Topology Assigned-Nodes List

In embodiments, the fabric manager identifies the assigned nodes for thelist of VLTs for which it does not have VLT membership. Thisnode-specific assigned node is again distributed to all other nodes asan ICL/VLT message.

In embodiments, with node-specific, assigned-node lists received fromall nodes, the fabric manager can update its system-wide assigned-nodelist.

iii. Building Current Topology Building Egress Mask and VLT-to-ICL Map

With system-wide VLT membership list and assigned-node list, a fabricmanager may prepare a node egress mask and a VLT-to-ICL map.

In embodiment, the fabric manager prepares and maintains a node egressmask and a VLT-to-ICL map, and its responsibility may includedistributing node-specific part(s) with other nodes.

In embodiments, in the above transactions, the nodes perform thetopology realization alone. They install port block masks or table entryupdates based on the realized topology.

iv. Setting Up Port Block Mask

In embodiments, from the egress mask, the fabric manager sends theICL/VLT messages to install Port Block Mask updates for its assignednodes.

In embodiments, as the next step, the fabric manager sends the ICL/VLTmessages to install Port Block Mask updates to its local ICL/VLTmanager.

In embodiments, the fabric manager also sends ICL/VLT messages withpre-computed Port Block Mask to other nodes to handle future failurescenarios.

In embodiments, the above order of ICL/VLT messages is preferablymaintained to ensure that the assigned node is ready to forward packetsfrom ICL to VLT, before the process of sending the packets to theassigned node through ICL link has started.

v. Distributing Unicast L2/L3 Table Updates

In embodiments, the fabric manager updates the local table entries,based on the MAC addresses learned and the protocol packets received. Inaddition to updating the local tables, the fabric manager may alsoensure that table entries of other nodes are also updated appropriatelyby the table synchronization mechanism.

In embodiments, the fabric manager builds sync ICL/VLT messages withthese table entries to update other nodes.

In embodiments, upon receiving these sync ICL/VLT messages, the fabricmanager checks if VLT-to-ICL conversion is required based on its VLTmembership.

In embodiments, if the node has VLT membership for the VLT referred by async ICL/VLT message, the sync ICL/VLT message is passed to the localICL/VLT manager without any conversion.

However, in embodiments, if the node does not have VLT membership forthe VLT referred by the sync ICL/VLT message, the fabric managerconverts the VLT port references of sync ICL/VLT messages to ICL portusing the system-wide VLT-to-ICL map and assigned-node list. Theconverted ICL/VLT sync message is sent to the local ICL/VLT manager forthe table entry update.

vi. Distributing L2 Multicast Table Updates

In embodiments, the fabric manager updates the local L2 multicast tableentries, based on the ports on which the Internet Group ManagementProtocol (IGMP) protocol packets is received. Apart from updating thelocal tables, in embodiments, the fabric manager may also ensure thattable entries of other nodes are also updated appropriately by the tablesynchronization mechanism.

In embodiments, the fabric manager builds sync ICL/VLT messages withthese table entries to update other nodes.

In embodiments, upon receiving these sync ICL/VLT messages, the fabricmanager checks if VLT-to-ICL conversion is required based on its VLTmembership. If the node has VLT membership for the VLT referred by syncICL/VLT message, the sync ICL/VLT message may be passed to the localICL/VLT Manager without any conversion. In embodiments, if the node doesnot have VLT membership for the VLT referred by sync ICL/VLT message,the fabric manager converts the VLT port references of sync ICL/VLTmessages to ICL port, as explained in more detail in below, using thesystem-wide VLT-to-ICL map and assigned-node list. The converted ICL/VLTsync message is sent to the local ICL/VLT Manager for the table entryupdate.

vii. Distributing L3 Multicast Table Updates

In embodiments, while playing the role of first-hop router (FHR), the L3multicast table is maintained by the node which joined the multicastgroup. Since the node that joined the multicast group alone executes theL3 multicast routing instance, other nodes are not updated by tablesynchronization mechanism.

While playing the role of last-hop router (LHR), the learned receiverports are synchronized similar to the process discussed above withrespect to the L2 multicast table updates.

viii. Pre-Compute Updates for Handling Failure Scenarios

In embodiments, the fabric manager prepares the actions to be performedfor some or all failure conditions, including ICL link failures and Nodefailures. In embodiments, the planned actions normally include but arenot limited to:

(1) One of the nodes should be moved out of the VLT system. The node tobe moved out is identified.

(2) New assigned nodes are identified. The existing nodes should beassigned with new assigned nodes.

(3) The port block masks are prepared to achieve the above two points.

(4) With the new VLT-to-ICL map, the table entries are modified with newICL port(s) to reflect this change.

In embodiments, if there is any topology change, these planned actionsare modified and updated to related nodes again.

In embodiments, if a failed ICL link is fixed, those nodes that use thatICL link request VLT membership lists from other nodes by sending anICL/VLT message with request for VLT membership list. The nodes respondto this request by sending their node-specific VLT membership list. Withthese responses, the fabric manager of these nodes builds a system-wideVLT membership list. In embodiments, the fabric managers compute thedatabases—VLT membership list, assigned-node list, and VLT-to-ICL mapfor the new topology. Based on the new assigned nodes identified, thefabric manager sends the new port block masks to corresponding nodes.The fabric manager applies its new VLT-to-ICL map on the existing tableentries and sends them to the local ICL/VLT manager.

In embodiments, the introduction of a new node is handled by the fabricmanager as follows. In embodiments, the fabric manager of the new noderequests the list of active nodes from other nodes. This list helps thenew node ensure that it has received responses from all the nodes tobuild the topology. In embodiments, the fabric manager of the new noderequests VLT membership lists from other nodes as explained earlier andbuilds a system-wide VLT membership list. It may also compute the othertables/databases, namely VLT membership list, assigned-node list, andVLT-to-ICL map for the new topology. Based on the assigned nodesidentified for the new node, the fabric manager sends the port blockmasks to corresponding nodes. In embodiments, the fabric manager of thenew node may request table entries from one or more of the nodes. Oncethe new node receives the table entries, it first applies its VLT-to-ICLmap on those received entries before sending them to the local ICL/VLTmanager.

ix. Communicating with Other Nodes

In embodiments, the fabric manager (e.g., fabric manager 810 in FIG. 8)communicates with the ICL/VLT manager (e.g., ICL/VLT manager 820 in FIG.8) of other nodes through the fabric manager of those nodes. A node'sfabric manager uses ICL links to send the VLT message. In embodiments,the fabric manager may use, by way of example and not limitation, ICLprotocol message format or other message formats to represent the aboveVLT messages. In embodiments, while sending VLT messages (for example,as ICL protocol messages, but other protocols may be used), the fabricmanager may ensure that the protocol control packet gets prioritized.

x. Maintaining ICL Mesh

In embodiments, the ICL links between the nodes are in a full meshconfiguration. In embodiments, to provide improved redundancy andbandwidth, each ICL link is a LAG on its own. Also, in embodiments, thefabric manager also ensures that all ICL ports are added to themembership of all VLANs of the VLT system.

xi. Table Entry Ownership and Aging of Entries

In embodiments, in the case of MAC table entries, the node whichoriginally learned the MAC entry owns the entry and aging of the MACentry is done by that node. In embodiments, similar to MAC table entryownership, the node which locally resolved the Address ResolutionProtocol (ARP) record owns the entry and aging of that ARP record. Inembodiments, for each (Source (S), Group (G)) session, the node thatactively receives the multicast traffic for that session assumes theownership.

In embodiments, upon aging out of an entry, the owner of the table entrysends a delete VLT message to other nodes to remove the correspondingentry.

In embodiments, a node may lose its ownership for a specific table entrybecause of a VLT LAG failure, an ICL link failure, or a node failure. Insuch cases, the fabric manager of the node that has or assumes thetopology-change-owner role sends a VLT message to a node to assume theownership of the table entry, and the topology-change-owner node updatesthis ownership change to all other nodes. In embodiments, thetopology-change-owner node may select a node to assume ownership of atable entry in any of a number of ways, including (but not limited to)selecting the node at random or selecting the node according to one ormore criteria (such as, for example, selecting the node with the lowestMAC address).

xii. Identifying ICL Failure and Node Failure

In embodiments, the fabric managers send “Hello” messages to otherfabric managers periodically. This mechanism helps to detect ICL linkfailures in finite time.

Fabric managers may also be configured to detect node failures. Inembodiments, on each node, the failure of any ICL link triggers a normal“build current topology” process. Since the failed node would notparticipate in this topology building process, it would be isolated fromthe topology.

In embodiments, one of the fabric managers that detects a failurecondition (ICL failure, node failure, or both) may assume the ownershipof topology change handler and take appropriate action, which isdiscussed in more detail in the following section.

xiii. Electing Topology-Change-Owner

In embodiments, upon topology change, the current owners of the tableentries might have lost their ownership. In such situations, thetopology-change-owner node takes the responsibility of determining thetable entries that require ownership change and sends ICL/VLT messagesto those nodes to assume the ownership for that table entry.

In embodiments, upon topology change, the fabric manager of each nodedetermines whether it needs to play the role of topology-change-ownerbased upon the following rules. Rule 1: if there is a LAG failure onNode Nx, then Node Nx should assume topology-change-owner role. Rule 2:if there is an ICL failure on ICL(Nx-Ny), and as per pre-computedactions, Node Ny is the node to be moved out of the VLT system, thenNode Nx should assume the topology-change-owner role. Rule 3: if thereis a node failure, then a node meeting one or more criteria (such as,for example, the node with the lowest MAC address) may assumetopology-change-owner role. Rule 4: if there is a LAG recovery on NodeNx, then Node Nx may assume the topology-change-owner role. Rule 5: ifthere is a node inclusion, then the node meeting one or more criteria(such as, for example, the node with the lowest MAC address among theexisting nodes) may assume the topology-change-owner role. And, Rule 6:the identification of the topology-change-owner for recovery of an ICLmay be similar to the node inclusion scenario.

xiv. Load Balancing

In embodiments, while identifying node-specific assigned nodes, thefabric manager may try to use as many nodes as assigned nodes to loadbalance the traffic with following guidelines. As a guideline, a fabricmanager should attempt to minimize the amount of VLT traffic redirectedto a specific assigned node. Also as a guideline, a fabric managershould attempt to maximize the number of nodes used as assigned nodes.One skilled in the art shall recognize other methodologies andguidelines that may be employed to assist in load balancing.

b. ICL/VLT Manager

In embodiments, an ICL/VLT manager enables a fabric manager to realizethe topology of the network and take appropriate steps. For example, inembodiments, the responsibilities/functionalities of an ICL/VLT managermay include one or more of the following:

-   -   Monitor the local port state change and table entry update    -   Send notification to Fabric Managers    -   Perform one or more actions requested by Fabric Managers    -   Handle failure conditions with pre-computed actions

More detailed information about the responsibilities/functionalities ofan ICL/VLT manager is provided below.

i. Monitor the Local Port State Change & Table Entry Update and SendNotifications to the Fabric Manager of all Nodes

In embodiments, the ICL/VLT manager monitors for port state changes andtable entry modifications. FIG. 9 depicts a general system and at leastsome of the functionality performed by an ICL/VLT manager according toembodiments of the present invention.

Depicted in FIG. 9 is a fabric manager 910 communicatively coupled to anICL/VLT manager 920 that is communicatively coupled with othernetworking components, which are collectively depicted as existingcomponent 925. In embodiments, the fabric manager 910 makes one or morerequests (930) of the ICL/VLT manager 920. The ICL/VLT manager 920interfaces (935) with the other networking components (such as thosedepicted in FIG. 6) to obtain port state changes and table entryupdates. In embodiments, this information is provided (940) to theICL/VLT manager 920, which is in turn provided (945) as a notificationor notifications to the fabric manager 910. In embodiments, the ICL/VLTmanager sends the notification messages to the fabric managers of allnodes for port status change and table entry modifications. And, inembodiments, these notifications are also received by the local fabricmanager.

ii. Perform the Action Requested by Fabric Managers of Other Nodes

In embodiments, an ICL/VLT manager configures the local ports based uponthe port-state-change request message(s) received from fabric managersof other nodes via its fabric manager. In embodiments, an ICL/VLTmanager also modifies the local tables based upon the table-entry-changerequest message(s) received from other nodes via its fabric manager.Also, in embodiments, an ICL/VLT manager notifies its local fabricmanager as needed to maintain state.

iii. Failure Handling

In embodiments, an ICL/VLT manager maintains one or more pre-computedupdates and planned actions from fabric managers for ICL link failureand node failure. Information regarding embodiments of pre-computedupdates was provided regarding pre-computed updates for handling failurescenarios in the fabric manager section (above). In embodiments, uponrecognizing an ICL link failure or a node failure, an ICL/VLT managerperforms the required planned actions by applying those pre-computedupdates.

iv. Message Format

In embodiments, an ICL/VLT manager communicates with the fabric managerof other nodes through ICL links (through Fabric Manager of othernodes). In embodiments, an ICL/VLT manager may use ICL protocol messageformat to represent the messages mentioned above. However, one skilledin the art shall recognize that other message formats may be used.

6. Forwarding Plane Programming Tables

Embodiments of the N-Node VLT system include data plane/forwarding planesystems and methodologies for n-way multipathing Presented below areembodiments for handling traffic flows.

a. Assigned Node Impact on Table and Egress Port Masks

In embodiments, any traffic coming on an ICL is, in general, blocked onall VLT ports of that node. However, this behavior may be modified inthe case of assigned node. Consider, by way of example and notlimitation, the following assigned-node assignment:

Assigned-Node (N2−VLT1)=>N1

The above assignment implies that VLT1 does not have a port on Node N2;and hence, for traffic ingressing on Node N2, it will use Node N1 toegress the packet to VLT1.

In embodiments, the above assignment will result in the followingprogramming:

(1) On Node N1, packets ingressing on the ICL(N2−N1) will be allowed toegress on VLT1; and

(2) On Node N2, for MACs learned on VLT1, the egress port will be markedas ICL(N1−N2).

b. Port Block Mask Programming

To prevent duplicate packets being received on the VLT and also toprevent loops, the following port blocks may be installed.

In embodiments, on a node Nx, a general rule for port block masks are:(1) traffic ingressing on any ICL link is normally blocked on all otherICLs; and (2) traffic ingressing on ICL(Nx-Ny) on node Ny is allowed ona specific VLTx, if for that VLTx, node Ny is the assigned node for VLTxon node Nx. In embodiments, this block may be dynamic and change basedon: (a) VLT membership on the nodes (i.e., links coming up or goingdown), and (b) changes in the assigned node for that VLTx on any node.

In embodiments, the port block mask for assigned nodes (like Ny) areprogrammed first. Port block mask for VLT-absent nodes (like Nx) may beprogrammed next, and other nodes may be programmed last.

In embodiments, all broadcast, unknown unicast, and unknown multicastpackets are flooded on the ICL by the ingress node to reach all othernodes.

c. MAC Table Programming

In embodiments, the MAC information learned on a VLTx on any node Nx maybe programmed on all nodes according to the following rules:

(1) If the VLTx has a member on node Nx, then the MAC will be programmedas learned on that VLTx.

(2) If the VLTx has no member on node Nz, and Ny is the assigned nodefor VLTx on Node Nz, then the MAC will be programmed as learned on theICL towards node Ny (i.e., ICL(Nz-Ny)). Since node Nz relies on node Ny,the MAC table update for Ny may be done before updating Nz.

(3) Essentially, if the VLT has an active member on this node, the nodeprovide a local exit; else, the traffic ingressing on this node isdirected to node Ny for that VLT.

In embodiments, learning is disabled on all ICL ports.

d. Layer 2 Multicast Programming

In embodiments, Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) controlpackets for a multicast group MGi from VLTx received on any node Nx maybe processed on all nodes per the rules below.

i. For IGMP Query Packets

(1) If the VLTx has a member on node Nx, the VLTx may be learned asMRouter-VLT for the multicast group MGi.

(2) If the VLTx has no member on node Nz, and Ny is the assigned nodefor VLTx on node Nz, then the ICL(Nz-Ny) may be learned as MRouter-VLTfor the multicast group MGi. Since Node Nz relies on Node Ny, membershipupdate for Ny may be done before updating Nz.

(3) In embodiments, only the node Nx processes the IGMP query packet andfloods it to all VLTs similar to broadcast packets. The port block maskprevents duplicate IGMP query packets reaching all VLTs.

ii. For IGMP Join Report/Leave Packets

(1) If the VLTx has a member on node Nx, the VLTx may be learned asmulticast group member-VLT for the multicast group MGi.

(2) If the VLTx has no member on node Nz, and Ny is the assigned nodefor VLTx on node Nz, then the ICL(Nz-Ny) may be learned as multicastgroup member-VLT for the multicast group MGi. Since Node Nz relies onthe Node Ny, membership update for Ny may be done before updating Nz.

(3) In case of a Join report packet, the multicast group member-VLT maybe added to the destination ports for multicast group MGi. In case of aLeave packet, the multicast group member-VLT may be removed from thedestination ports for multicast group MGi.

(4) In embodiments, the node Nx checks if the Join report/Leave packetshould be flooded to MRouter-VLTs. Based on whether it should beflooded, the node Nx floods packets to MRouter-VLTs.

e. Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) Entry Programming

In embodiments, if ARP is resolved for an IP address of an L3 VLANinterface VLANx, where VLTx is a member of that VLAN on any node Nx,then the ARP entry will be programmed on all nodes per the rules below:

(1) The ARP response packet may be processed as mentioned below, only ifthe destination MAC of the ARP response is one of the my-stationaddresses of the VLT nodes.

(2) If VLTx has a member on node Nx, then the ARP entry may beprogrammed as resolved on that VLTx.

(3) If VLTx has no member on node Nz, and Ny is the assigned node forVLTx on Node Nz, then the ARP entry may be programmed, as resolved onICL(Nz-Ny). Since Node Nz relies on the ARP entry on Node Ny, ARP entryupdate for Ny may be done before updating Nz.

(4) Equal-cost multi-path routing (ECMP) option may be considered inLayer 3 packet handling.

f. Layer3 Multicast Programming

In embodiments, if one of the VLT nodes acts as the designated router,then one or more of the other VLT nodes may act as backup designatedrouter.

i. Node Nx as Source-Side Designated Router (DR)/First Hop Router(FHR) 1. For L3 Multicast Data Packet

In embodiments, the multicast data packet for a multicast group MGi fromVLTx received on any node Nx may be processed on all nodes per the rulesbelow:

(1) If the node Nx is the designated router (DR)/first hop router (FHR):

(a) In the case of unknown multicast packets, it sends unicast sourceregistration packets to Rendezvous Point (RP).

(b) In the case of known multicast packets, it replicates the packets tothe interfaces specified by the outgoing interface (oif) list of groupMGi.

(2) If the node Nx is not the DR, it floods the multicast packet on theICL and other L2 interfaces.

2. Processing PIM Stop Register Packets

In embodiments, upon receiving a Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM)stop register packet for a multicast group MGi from a Layer 3 virtuallink trunk VLTx, the node Nx, being a designated router, will processthe packet.

3. Processing PIM (S,G) Join Packets

In embodiments, upon receiving a PIM join packet for a multicast groupMGi from a Layer 3 virtual link trunk VLTx, the node Nx, being a firsthop router, will add VLTx to the (S,G) outgoing interface (oif) list ofgroup MGi.

4. Processing PIM (S,G) Prune Packets

In embodiments, upon receiving a PIM prune packet for a multicast groupMGi from a Layer 3 virtual link trunk VLTx, the node Nx, being a firsthop router, will remove VLTx from the (S,G) outgoing interface (oif)list of group MGi.

ii. Node Nx as Receive-Side DR/Last Hop Router (LHR) 1. For IGMPJoin/Membership Report Packet

In embodiments, upon receiving an IGMP join/membership report packet fora multicast group MGi from VLTx, the node Nx adds VLTx to the outgoinginterface (oif) list of group MGi. Based on the processing, the node Nxmay send PIM join to the incoming interface (iif) VLTs, if required.

2. For IGMP Leave Packet

In embodiments, upon receiving an IGMP leave packet for a multicastgroup MGi from VLTx, the node Nx removes VLTx from the outgoinginterface (oif) list of group MGi. Based on the processing, the node Nxmay send PIM prune to incoming interface (iif) VLTs, if required. Inembodiments, the node Nx may also check if any interested receivers arepresent by sending an IGMP Query to all MGi members.

3. For Layer 3 Multicast Data Packet

In embodiments, Layer 3 multicast data packets for a multicast group MGifrom Layer 3 virtual link trunk VLTx received on any node Nx may bereplicated to the interfaces specified by the outgoing interface (oif)list for group MGi.

7. Example Packet Walk-Throughs

FIGS. 10-12 depicts some packet walk-throughs for various situationsaccording to embodiments of the present invention. These examples areprovided by way of illustration only and not limitation.

a. Layer 2/Layer 3 Unicast Packet Walk-Through

FIG. 10 depicts a Layer 2/Layer 3 unicast packet walk-through accordingto embodiments of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 10, anincoming unicast packet 1015 received at an ingress node 1005 that ispart of an N-Node VLT system. The ingress node will determine theincoming VLAN 1020 for the unicast packet. The L2/L3 forwarding 1025will identify forwarding designation for the packet based upon IP or MACtable information. Depending upon the designation, one of three optionsmay occur: (1) local exit; (2) LAG local exit; or (3) transmit via anICL link to a node that has a link to the designation.

Path (1)—Local Exit: A unicast packet 1015 ingressing on a node 1005 ofthe VLT N-Node system that has a designation that has a link on theingress node 1005 will egress through that local port link 1045 on theingress node 1005.

Path (2)—LAG Local Exit: If the unicast packet has a designation thathas multiple links of a LAG that terminate on the ingress node 1005, thepacket traffic may be distributed or otherwise load balanced (e.g., viapacket hash 1035) and is transmitted via one or more of the local links1045.

Path (3)—Transmission via ICL to another Node: If the ingress node 1005does not have a link to the designation for the packet, the ingress nodeselects a node in the N-Node VLT system that does. If multiple nodes inthe system participate in the designation, then the ingress node mayselect one of the nodes to receive the traffic. In embodiments, theingress node sends the data to the assigned node for this data traffic.

In embodiments, the packet traffic arriving at the egress node on theICL link is processed 1070 to identify the egress VLAN tag. The L2forwarding 1075 uses the MAC address look-up to identify thedesignation. Path (3) comprises two possible pathways depending upon thepacket's designation—those pathways are similar to the Path (1) and Path(2), above. For example, if the unicast packet traffic is intended for anode that has multiple links of a VLT/LAG on the egress node, the packettraffic may be distributed or otherwise load balanced (e.g., via packethash 1085) and is transmitted via the local port 1090 of a VLT LAG link1095. If the unicast packet traffic is intended for a single link on theegress node, the packet is transmitted via that local port 1095 on theegress node.

b. Layer 2 Broadcast Packet Walk-Through

FIG. 11 depicts Layer 2 broadcast packet walk-through according toembodiments of the present invention. The incoming packet 1115 isreceived at the ingress node 1105, and the VLAN is identified 1120.Since this is a Layer 2 broadcast, the packet broadcast will stay withinthe incoming VLAN. The forwarding table 1125 indicates which ports orLAGs on which the packet should be broadcast. Similar to the priorscenarios of FIG. 10, the packets will be sent to local ports and/orpeer nodes depending upon the system configuration. Thus, if there arelinks that are present on the ingress node that are part of the VLAN(i.e., local ports), the packet is broadcast to them. If there aremembers of the VLAN that are not on the ingress node, the packet is senton the ICL link(s) to these assigned nodes. It shall be noted that thepacket may be sent on multiple ICL links 1160. It should be noted thatthe packet flow of FIG. 11 may also include an egress port mask 1197 tostop loops.

c. IP Multicast Packet Walk-Through

FIG. 12 depicts IP multicast packet flows according to embodiments ofthe present invention. One skilled in the art shall recognize that IPmulticast packet flows are generally the same to those depicted abovewith respect to FIG. 11 with the exception that some of the processinginvolves some Layer 3 elements. For example, part of the packetprocesses involve looking at other tables, such as IP addresses,receiver interfaces 1227, and local receiver interfaces 1275, the soforth.

8. Packet Flows Examples

FIGS. 13-19 depicts some packet flows for various situations accordingto embodiments of the present invention.

a. Broadcast and Unknown Unicast Packet Flow Example 1

FIG. 13 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system 1300according to embodiments of the present invention. Depicted in FIG. 13are four nodes N1 (1305-1), N2 (1305-2), N3 (1305-3), and N4 (1305-4),which form a 4-node VLT system 1320.

In forming the VLT system, the nodes are connected via a plurality oflinks 1325. These links may be referred to, interchangeably, asinter-node links (INLs), inter-chassis links (ICLs), or Virtual LinkTrunk Interfaces (VLTIs). As shown in the embodiment depicted in FIG.13, the nodes (N1-N4) are connected in a full mesh. While the depictedembodiment is a physical full mesh, it shall be noted that the nodes maybe in a logical full mesh.

Also depicted in FIG. 13 are a number of VLT LAGs. External node E11310-1 has three links, which terminate on nodes N1, N3, and N4. Thesethree links together form a VLT LAG, namely VLT1 1315-1. External nodeE2 1310-2 has four links that together form VLT2 1315-2. These linksterminate on nodes N1, N2, N3, and N4. Finally, external node E3 1310-3has one link, which terminate on node N2. This link forms VLT3 1315-3.Thus, the VLT memberships may be summarized as follows:

VLT1 {N1, N3, N4}

VLT2 {N1, N2, N3, N4}

VLT3 {N2}

The assigned nodes for the N-Node VLT system 1300 in FIG. 13 may be asfollows:

Assigned-Node {N2−VLT1}=>N1

Assigned-Node {N1−VLT3}=>N2

Assigned-Node {N3−VLT3}=>N2

Assigned-Node {N4−VLT3}=>N2

In embodiments, the egress mask may be generated for each of the nodesin FIG. 13. The following table summarizes the system-wide egress mask:

N1 N2 N3 N4 Egress Egress Egress Egress Ingress Mask Ingress MaskIngress Mask Ingress Mask ICL(N2 − N1) Allow VLT1 ICL(N1 − N2) Deny VLT1ICL(N1 − N3) Deny VLT1 ICL(N1 − N4) Deny VLT1 Deny VLT2 Deny VLT2 DenyVLT2 Deny VLT2 Deny VLT3 Allow VLT3 Deny VLT3 Deny VLT3 ICL(N3 − N1)Deny VLT1 ICL(N3 − N2) Deny VLT1 ICL(N2 − N3) Deny VLT1 ICL(N2 − N4)Deny VLT1 Deny VLT2 Deny VLT2 Deny VLT2 Deny VLT2 Deny VLT3 Allow VLT3Deny VLT3 Deny VLT3 ICL(N4 − N1) Deny VLT1 ICL(N4 − N2) Deny VLT1 ICL(N4− N3) Deny VLT1 ICL(N3 − N4) Deny VLT1 Deny VLT2 Deny VLT2 Deny VLT2Deny VLT2 Deny VLT3 Allow VLT3 Deny VLT3 Deny VLT3

In embodiments, using the system 1300 depicted in FIG. 13 as an example,the handling of broadcast/unknown unicast packets may be processed asfollows. First, external node E3 (1310-3) sends (1350) a broadcastpacket to node N2 (1305-2). Node N2 (1305-2) floods (1355) the broadcastpackets to all its local ports including all its ICL ports. The nodesN1, N3, and N4 flood (1360) the packets to their local ports based ontheir port blocks. Note that traffic ingressing on ICL(N2−N1) on node N1is allowed on VLT1, as node N1 is the assigned node for VLT1 on node N2,but the data is blocked at node N3 and node N4.

b. Broadcast and Unknown Unicast Packet Flow Example 2

FIG. 14 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system 1400according to embodiments of the present invention. The system depictedin FIG. 14 has four nodes N1 (1405-1), N2 (1405-2), N3 (1405-3), and N4(1405-4), which form a 4-node VLT system 1420. The embodiment depictedin FIG. 14 is the same configuration as in FIG. 13. Thus, it has thesame VLT memberships, the same assigned nodes, and the same egress mask.

In embodiments, using the system 1400 depicted in FIG. 14 as an example,the handling of broadcast/unknown unicast packets may be processed asfollows. First, external node E1 (1410-1) sends (1450) a broadcastpacket to node N3 (1405-3). Node N3 (1405-3) floods (1455) the broadcastpackets to all its local ports including all its ICL ports. The nodesN1, N2, and N4 flood (1460) the packets to their local ports based ontheir port blocks. Note that traffic ingressing on ICL(N3−N2) on node N2is allowed to exit/egress on VLT3, as node N2 is the assigned node forVLT3 on node N3, but the traffic is blocked for nodes N1 and N4.

c. Layer 2 Unicast Packet Flow

FIG. 15 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system 1500according to embodiments of the present invention. Depicted in FIG. 15are three nodes N1 (1505-1), N2 (1505-2), and N3 (1505-3), which form a3-node VLT system 1520.

In forming the VLT system, the nodes are connected via a plurality oflinks 1525. As shown in the embodiment depicted in FIG. 15, the nodes(N1-N3) are connected in a full mesh. While the depicted embodiment is aphysical full mesh, it shall be noted that the nodes may be in a logicalfull mesh.

External node E11510-1 has three links, which terminate on nodes N1, N2,and N3. These three links together form VLT11515-1. External nodeE21510-2 has two links that together form VLT21515-2. These linksterminate on nodes N1 and N2. Finally, external node E31510-3 has onelink, which terminate on node N3, and forms VLT31515-3. The VLTmemberships may be summarized as follows:

VLT1 {N1, N2, N3}

VLT2 {N1, N2}

VLT3 {N3}

The assigned nodes for the N-Node VLT system 1500 in FIG. 15 may be asfollows:

Assigned-Node {N3−VLT2}=>N1

Assigned-Node {N1−VLT3}=>N3

Assigned-Node {N2−VLT3}=>N3

In embodiments, assume for the purposes of this example that thefollowing MAC addresses for each VLT are: MAC M1 at VLT1; MAC M2 atVLT2; and MAC M3 at VLT3.

The following table summarizes the MAC table:

N1 N2 N3 DST Egress DST Egress DST Egress MAC Port MAC Port MAC Port M1VLT1 M1 VLT1 M1 VLT1 M2 VLT2 M2 VLT2 M2 ICL(N1 − N3) M3 ICL(N1 − N3) M3ICL(N2 − N3) M3 VLT3

In embodiments, using the system 1500 depicted in FIG. 15 as an example,the handling of Layer 2 unicast packets may be processed as follows.First, external node E3 (1510-3) sends (1550) a Layer 2 unicast packetdestined to M2 at VLT2 through node N3 (1505-3). Node N3 (1505-3) sends(1555) the unicast packet to its assigned node, Node N1, via the ICL. AtNode N1, the packet reaches (1560) M2 by local exit. Note that, inembodiments, the MAC entry may be sent (1565) as a VLT message to allthe other nodes.

d. Layer 2 Multicast Packet Flow

FIG. 16 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system 1600according to embodiments of the present invention. Depicted in FIG. 16are four nodes N1 (1605-1), N2 (1605-2), N3 (1605-3), and N4 (1605-4),which form a 4-node VLT system 1620. In forming the VLT system, thenodes are connected via a plurality of ICL links 1625. As shown in theembodiment depicted in FIG. 16, the nodes (N1-N4) are connected in afull (physical or logical) mesh.

External node E1 1610-1 has three links, which terminate on nodes N1,N3, and N4. These three links together form VLT11615-1. External nodeE21610-2 has three links that together form VLT2 1615-2. These linksterminate on nodes N1, N3, and N4. Finally, external node E31610-3 hasone link, which terminate on node N2 and forms VLT31615-3. The VLTmemberships may be summarized as follows:

VLT1 {N1, N3, N4}

VLT2 {N1, N3, N4}

VLT3 {N2}

The assigned nodes for the N-Node VLT system 1600 in FIG. 16 may be asfollows:

Assigned-Node {N2−VLT1}=>N1

Assigned-Node {N2−VLT2}=>N3

Assigned-Node {N1−VLT3}=>N2

Assigned-Node {N3−VLT3}=>N2

Assigned-Node {N4−VLT3}=>N2

In embodiments, assume for the purposes of this example that, for themulticast group MG1, VLT1 is the receiving member and VLT3 is theMRouter member. Also assume that VLT2 is the receiving member ofmulticast Group MG2.

The following is the Multicast Table for each node:

N1 N2 N3 N4 Multicast Egress Multicast Egress Multicast Egress MulticastEgress Group Ports Group Ports Group Ports Group Ports MG1 VLT1 MG1ICL(N2 − MG1 VLT1 MG1 VLT1 ICL(N1 − N1) ICL(N3 − ICL(N4 − N2) VLT3 N2)N2) MG2 VLT2 MG2 ICL(N2 − MG2 VLT2 MG2 VLT2 N3)

In embodiments, using the system 1600 depicted in FIG. 16 as an example,the handling of Layer 2 multicast packets may be processed as follows.First, external node E3 (1610-3) sends (1650) a Layer 2 multicast packetdestined to MG2 through node N2 (1605-2). Node N2 (1605-2) sends (1655)the multicast packet to its assigned node, Node N3. At Node N3, thepacket reaches (1660) MG2 by local exit. Note that, in embodiments, theIGMP membership report may be sent (1665) as a VLT message to all theother nodes.

e. Layer 3 Unicast Packet Flow

FIG. 17 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system 1700according to embodiments of the present invention. Depicted in FIG. 17are five nodes N1 (1705-1), N2 (1705-2), N3 (1705-3), N4 (1705-4), andN5 (1705-5), which form a 5-node VLT system 1720. In forming the VLTsystem, the nodes are connected via a plurality of ICL links 1725. Asshown in the embodiment depicted in FIG. 17, the nodes (N1-N5) areconnected in a full (physical or logical) mesh.

External node E1 1710-1 has three links, which terminate on nodes N1,N3, and N4. These three links together form VLT1 1715-1. External nodeE2 1710-2 has three links that together form VLT2 1715-2. These linksterminate on nodes N1, N2, and N3. Finally, external node E3 1710-3 hasone link, which terminate on node N5 and forms VLT3 1715-3. The VLTmemberships may be summarized as follows:

VLT1 {N1, N3, N4}

VLT2 {N1, N2, N3}

VLT3 {N5}

The assigned nodes for the N-Node VLT system 1700 in FIG. 17 may be asfollows:

Assigned-Node {N2−VLT1}=>N1

Assigned-Node {N5−VLT1}=>N1

Assigned-Node {N4−VLT2}=>N3

Assigned-Node {N5−VLT2}=>N3

Assigned-Node {N1−VLT3}=>N5

Assigned-Node {N2−VLT3}=>N5

Assigned-Node {N3−VLT3}=>N5

Assigned-Node {N4−VLT3}=>N5

In embodiments, assume for the purposes of this example that VLT1 andVLT3 are members of VLAN1; VLT2 is a member of VLAN2; and that IP1, IP2,and IP3 are the IP addresses at E1, E2, and E3. Also, the following isthe L3 Table for each node:

N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 DST Egress DST Egress DST Egress DST Egress DST Egress IPPort IP Port IP Port IP Port IP Port IP1 VLT1 IP1 ICL(N2 − N1) IP1 VLT1IP1 VLT1 IP1 ICL(N5 − N1) IP2 VLT2 IP2 VLT2 IP2 VLT2 IP2 ICL(N4 − N3)IP2 ICL(N5 − N3) IP3 ICL(N1 − N5) IP3 ICL(N2 − N5) IP3 ICL(N3 − N5) IP3ICL(N4 − N5) IP3 VLT3

In embodiments, using the system 1700 depicted in FIG. 17 as an example,the handling of Layer 3 unicast packets may be processed as follows.First, external node E3 (1710-3) sends (1750) a Layer 3 unicast packetdestined to IP address IP2. Node N5 (1705-75) sends (1755) the packet toits assigned node, Node N3. At Node N3, the packet reaches (1760) IPaddress IP2 by local exit. Note that, in embodiments, the ARPresponse/ARP entry may be sent (1765) as a VLT message to all the othernodes.

f. Layer 3 Multicast Packet Flow First Hop Router

FIG. 18 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system 1800according to embodiments of the present invention. Depicted in FIG. 18are four nodes N1 (1805-1), N2 (1805-2), N3 (1805-3), and N4 (1805-4),which form a 4-node VLT system 1820. In forming the VLT system, thenodes are connected via a plurality of ICL links. As shown in theembodiment depicted in FIG. 18, the nodes (N1-N4) are connected in afull (physical or logical) mesh.

External node E1 1810-1 has three links, which terminate on nodes N1,N3, and N4. These three links together form VLT1 1815-1. External nodeE2 1810-2 has three links that together form VLT2 1815-2. These linksterminate on nodes N1, N3, and N4. External node E3 1810-3 has one link,which terminate on node N2 and forms VLT3 1815-3. Also depicted in FIG.18 is a rendezvous point (RP) device 1810-4 that connects to node N4,which acts a first hop router (FHR) for multicast group MG3. Finally,FIG. 18 also includes a last hop router 1810-5 that connects to the RPand to Node 4.

The VLT memberships may be summarized as follows:

VLT1 {N1, N3, N4}

VLT2 {N1, N3, N4}

VLT3 {N2}

The assigned nodes for the N-Node VLT system 1800 in FIG. 18 may be asfollows:

Assigned-Node {N2−VLT1}=>N1

Assigned-Node {N2−VLT2}=>N3

Assigned-Node {N1−VLT3}=>N2

Assigned-Node {N3−VLT3}=>N2

Assigned-Node {N4−VLT3}=>N2

Assume for the purposes of this example that Node N4 is the first hoprouter for MG3; that VLT4 and VLT5 are Layer 3 VLTs (Layer 3interfaces). Also, assume that at Node N4, for MG3: VLT5 is the outgoinginterface (OIF) list member before shortest path tree (SPT) switchover;and VLT4 is the outgoing interface (OIF) list member after SPTswitchover.

Using the system 1800 depicted in FIG. 18 as an example, the handling ofLayer 3 multicast packet flow may be processed as follows.

Before SPT Switchover:

In embodiments, the source 1830 sends (1850, 1855) a Layer 3 multicastpacket to the FHR 1805-4 destined to MG3. Node N2 1805-2 floods (1860)the packet to Node N4 (FHR) through the ICL. Node N4 replicates (1865)the packet to RP, which replicates (1865) the packet to the LHR 1810-5.Finally, the LHR replicates 1870 the packet to the receiver 1840.

After SPT Switchover:

In embodiments, the source 1830 sends (1850, 1855) a Layer 3 multicastpacket to the FHR 1805-4 destined to MG3. Node N2 1805-2 floods (1860)the packet to Node N4 (FHR) through the ICL. Node N4 replicates (1875)the packet to the LHR 1810-5. Finally, the LHR replicates 1870 thepacket to the receiver 1840. In embodiments, a Protocol IndependentMulticast (PIM) Join (S,G) message (1880) and a PIM Join (*,G) message1885 is sent to node N4 (FHR) 1805-4.

g. Layer 3 Multicast Packet Flow Last Hop Router

FIG. 19 depicts an example embodiment of an N-Node VLT system 1900according to embodiments of the present invention. Depicted in FIG. 19are four nodes N1 (1905-1), N2 (1905-2), N3 (1905-3), and N4 (1905-4),which form a 4-node VLT system 1920. In forming the VLT system, thenodes are connected via a plurality of ICL links. As shown in theembodiment depicted in FIG. 19, the nodes (N1-N4) are connected in afull (physical or logical) mesh.

External node E1 1910-1 has three links, which terminate on nodes N1,N3, and N4. These three links together form VLT1 1915-1. External nodeE2 1910-2 has three links that together form VLT2 1915-2. These linksterminate on nodes N1, N3, and N4. External node E3 1910-3 has one link,which terminate on node N2 and forms VLT3 1915-3. Also depicted in FIG.19 is a rendezvous point (RP) device 1910-4 that connects to node N4,which acts a last hop router (LHR) for the multicast group MG3. Finally,FIG. 19 also includes a first hop router 1910-5 that connects to the RPand to Node 4.

The VLT memberships may be summarized as follows:

VLT1 {N1, N3, N4}

VLT2 {N1, N3, N4}

VLT3 {N2}

The assigned nodes for the N-Node VLT system 1900 in FIG. 19 may be asfollows:

Assigned-Node {N2−VLT1}=>N1

Assigned-Node {N2−VLT2}=>N3

Assigned-Node {N1−VLT3}=>N2

Assigned-Node {N3−VLT3}=>N2

Assigned-Node {N4−VLT3}=>N2

Assume for the purposes of this example that Node N4 is the last hoprouter for MG3; that VLT4 and VLT5 are Layer 3 VLTs (Layer 3interfaces). Also, assume that at Node N4, for MG3: VLT5 is the incominginterface (IIF) list member before shortest path tree (SPT) switchover;and VLT4 is the incoming interface (IIF) list member after SPTswitchover.

Using the system 1900 depicted in FIG. 19 as an example, the handling ofLayer 3 multicast packet flow may be processed as follows.

Before SPT Switchover:

In embodiments, the source 1930 sends (1950) a Layer 3 multicast packetto the FHR 1910-5 destined to MG3. The FHR sends (1955) the packet tothe RP 1910-4. The RP sends (1958) the packet to Node 4, which acts asthe LHR. Node N4 1905-4 floods (1960) the packet to Node N2 through theICL. At Node N2, the packet reaches (1965, 1970) MG3 by local exit.

After SPT Switchover:

In embodiments, the source 1930 sends (1950) a Layer 3 multicast packetto the FHR 1910-5 destined to MG3. The FHR sends (1975) the packet toNode N4 (LHR) through the ICL. At Node N2, the packet reaches (1965,1970) MG3 via local exit.

In embodiments, a Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) Join (S,G)message (1980) is communicated to the FHR and a PIM Join (*,G) message1885 is communicated to the RP.

9. Failure Scenarios

Aspects of the N-Node VLT system include handling various failurescenarios. By way of illustration, presented below are embodiments forhandling: (1) VLT LAG failure; (2) ICL failure; and (3) Node failure.

a. Handling VLT LAG Failure Table Programming for VLT LAG Failure

FIG. 20 depicts a method for handling a VLT LAG in an N-Node VLT systemaccording to embodiments of the present invention. In embodiments, whena VLT LAG is broken on node Nx, the node Nx becomes (2005) thetopology-change-owner and performs table entry ownership change orchanges. Node Nx computes (2010) the assigned node for the failed VLTLAG and installs the necessary port block masks. When the broken VLT LAGis restored, the port block masks installed to handle the VLT LAGfailure may be (2015) reverted back to their pre-failure states. Inembodiments, to avoid potential loops again, the existing port blocksare opened only after the new blocks are installed first. Here, node Nxwould be the topology-change-owner; it assumes the topology-change-ownerrole and performs table entry ownership change(s).

b. Handling ICL Failure Table Programming for ICL Failure

FIG. 21 depicts a method for handling ICL link failure in an N-Node VLTsystem according to embodiments of the present invention. Inembodiments, when an ICL link ICL(Nx−Ny) is broken, one of the node(e.g., node Nx) is chosen to be moved out of the N-Node VLT system basedon certain criteria which is discussed below but some examples includethe ability to maintain full (physical/logical) mesh between nodesand/or the ability to have maximum number of VLTs available after thechange. In embodiments, the VLT and ICL ports of the node Nx areprogrammed according to the following rules:

(1) The VLT ports are disabled (2105) at Nx and Ny according to thefollowing rules: (a) if VLTx has Nx as its only member, VLTx is retainedat node Nx; and (b) if VLTy has more members including Nx, then VLTx isdisabled at node Nx.

(2) All of the ICL ports, except one, are disabled (2110) at Nx. Thecriterion or criteria to choose the ICL to be retained is discussedbelow. It shall be noted that, in embodiments, no ICL ports need to bedisabled—they may all be active. In so doing, it can be beneficial tocontinue to communicate and establish full mesh when the “down” ICL linkcomes back up.

(3) The node (e.g., Nx) is then moved out (2115) of the VLT system. Theport block mask and table programming will ensure that it will behavelike a normal switch connected to one of the VLT node.

(4) Since the topology has changed, the assigned nodes are recomputed(2120).

(5) To avoid potential loops, while changing the assigned nodes, theexisting port blocks are opened (2125) only after the new blocks areinstalled first.

(6) The node that is retained in the VLT system is thetopology-change-owner. That node changes (2130) the ownership of theaffected table entries to an existing node that meets a selectedcriterion or criteria (e.g., the node that has the lowest MAC address).

(7) When the broken link is restored, the node Nx will be included(2135) in N-Node VLT system again. Since the topology has changed again,the assigned nodes are computed again. To avoid potential loops again,the existing port blocks are opened only after the new blocks areinstalled first. Here, the node that satisfies a criterion or criteria(e.g., the node with lowest MAC address among the existing nodes)becomes the topology-change-owner.

c. Handling Node Failure Table Programming for Node Failure

FIG. 22 depicts a method for handling node failure in an N-Node VLTsystem according to embodiments of the present invention. Inembodiments, when a Node Nx has failed, it may be moved out of theN-Node VLT system and the following steps taken. Since the topology haschanged, the assigned nodes are recomputed (2205) by all the nodes. Whenthe node failure is detected, the node meeting a criterion or criteria(e.g., the node with the lowest MAC address) becomes thetopology-change-owner, and it changes (2210) the ownership of theaffected table entries to the node that has the lowest MAC address. Toavoid potential loops, while changing the assigned nodes, the existingport blocks may be opened (2215) only after the new blocks are installedfirst.

When the failed node is brought up, it is again included in the N-NodeVLT system. Since the topology has changed again, the assigned nodes arerecomputed (2220) again. To avoid potential loops, the existing portblocks are opened only after the new blocks are installed first. Here,the node that satisfies a criterion or criteria (e.g., the node withlowest MAC address among the existing nodes) becomes thetopology-change-owner.

10. Advantages

It shall be noted that embodiments of an N-Node VLT system provideseveral advantages over prior solutions. Presented below are some of theadvantages provided by N-Node systems. One skilled in the art shallrecognize other benefits.

a. Large L2 Domain

An N-Node VLT system allows for a single large L2 domain with multipleswitches at a single layer (access, distribution, or core), that operateand appear logically as a single switch. While providing greaterflexibility of a single switch, it addresses common scaling issuespresent in large L2 domain.

b. Virtual Chassis

An N-Node VLT system behaves like a virtual chassis wherein it allowsdynamic introduction of additional nodes to address improved resiliencyand bandwidth requirements. Also, unlike a regular chassis, the trafficthrough the fabric links is greatly reduced in N-Node VLT systems asmost of the traffic is expected to use local-exit to reach thedestination.

c. Flexibility Connect to any Number of Nodes

With N-Node VLT system, each switch may be connected to a maximum of Nnodes within the VLT-Domain. This feature allows networking operationsvastly greater flexibility in expanding their networks. No longer mustsystems be expanded in set units of only one or two nodes. Rather, anynumber of nodes may be added. Furthermore, in prior system a domaincould only have a limited number of nodes, with an N-Node VLT system anynumber of nodes is possible. And, when joining the nodes, one need notconnect all the nodes together with ICL links as the fabric will be ableto route to the nodes.

d. Scalability

With support for multiple nodes within a VLT-domain, the scalability isincreased manifold in terms of number of ports and number of VLTs.

e. Bandwidth

With multi-point LAG local exit on VLT members, an N-Node VLT systemprovides improved bandwidth for east-west traffic. Unlike typicalchassis systems that drive much of the traffic to a backplane, N-NodeVLT systems are designed to allow for much of the traffic to have alocal exit. Thus, the bandwidth for east-west traffic is proportional tothe number of nodes in the N-Node VLT system.

f. Improved Resiliency

The failure of a node in an N-Node VLT system impacts the availablebandwidth much less than the 50% of current 2-node systems. In an N-NodeVLT system, the failure of a node only impacts the overall system by atmost 1/N. Therefore, the availability can be further improved byincreasing the number of nodes in the VLT system.

g. L3 Capability

Another key benefit that separates N-Node VLT systems from existingapproaches is its support for Layer 3 (L3). By supporting existing L3protocols, an N-Node VLT system adds scalability and resiliency to thoseL3 protocols.

h. Multi-Fabric Control Plane

Because the N-Node VLT system operates using a multi-fabric controlplane of loosely coupled nodes, it provides better resiliency. Also,multiple control planes distributed across the nodes provides betterscalability as compared to single brain approaches.

i. Single-Fabric Management

Because the N-Node VLT is designed with a single management entity,managing the cluster of devices is simplified like managing a singledevice.

j. Collapsed Heterogeneous Core

With the introduction of N-Node VLT feature for a wide range of new andexisting switch products, it is possible to build a VLT domain withheterogeneous switches. The switches negotiate their capabilities whenthey build the VLT system.

11. Information Handling System Embodiments

It shall be noted that the present patent document is directed toinformation handling systems. For purposes of this disclosure, aninformation handling system may include any instrumentality or aggregateof instrumentalities operable to compute, calculate, determine,classify, process, transmit, receive, retrieve, originate, switch,store, display, communicate, manifest, detect, record, reproduce,handle, or utilize any form of information, intelligence, or data forbusiness, scientific, control, or other purposes. For example, aninformation handling system may be a personal computer (e.g., desktop orlaptop), tablet computer, mobile device (e.g., personal digitalassistant (PDA) or smart phone), server (e.g., blade server or rackserver), a network storage device, or any other suitable device and mayvary in size, shape, performance, functionality, and price. Theinformation handling system may include random access memory (RAM), oneor more processing resources such as a central processing unit (CPU) orhardware or software control logic, ROM, and/or other types ofnonvolatile memory. Additional components of the information handlingsystem may include one or more disk drives, one or more network portsfor communicating with external devices as well as various input andoutput (I/O) devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, touchscreen and/or avideo display. The information handling system may also include one ormore buses operable to transmit communications between the varioushardware components.

FIG. 23 depicts a block diagram of an exemplary information handlingsystem node according to embodiments of the present invention. It willbe understood that the functionalities shown for switch 2300 may operateto support various embodiments of a node in an N-Node VLTsystem—although it shall be understood that a node in an N-Node VLTsystem may be differently configured and include different components.The node 2300 may include a plurality of I/O ports 2305, a dataprocessing and fabric component 2315, tables 2320, and a switch controlfunctionality portion 2325. In embodiments, the I/O ports 2305 areconnected to one or more switches or other client devices, at least someof which form VLT LAGs. In addition, one or more ports are connected viainter-node links 2310 to other information handling system nodes in then-node VLT system. The data processing functionality 2315 may useinformation included in the network data received at the node 2300, aswell as information stored in the tables 2320, including fabric-leveland node-level tables, to identify a next hop for the network data,among other possible activities. In embodiments, the switching fabricthen schedules the network data for propagation through the node to anegress port for transmission to the next hop.

It shall be noted that aspects of the present invention may be encodedupon one or more non-transitory computer-readable media withinstructions for one or more processors or processing units to causesteps to be performed. It shall be noted that the one or morenon-transitory computer-readable media shall include volatile andnon-volatile memory. It shall be noted that alternative implementationsare possible, including a hardware implementation or a software/hardwareimplementation. Hardware-implemented functions may be realized usingASIC(s), programmable arrays, digital signal processing circuitry, orthe like. Accordingly, the “means” terms in any claims are intended tocover both software and hardware implementations. Similarly, the term“computer-readable medium or media” as used herein includes softwareand/or hardware having a program of instructions embodied thereon, or acombination thereof. With these implementation alternatives in mind, itis to be understood that the figures and accompanying descriptionprovide the functional information one skilled in the art would requireto write program code (i.e., software) and/or to fabricate circuits(i.e., hardware) to perform the processing required.

While the inventions have been described in conjunction with severalspecific embodiments, it is evident to those skilled in the art thatmany further alternatives, modifications, application, and variationswill be apparent in light of the foregoing description. Thus, theinventions described herein are intended to embrace all suchalternatives, modifications, applications and variations as may fallwithin the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. An information handling system node comprising: aplurality of input/output (I/O) ports, one or more of which areconfigurable to be part of one or more link aggregation groups (LAGs),each LAG comprising at least one LAG member link that terminates at aport of the information handling system node and terminates at a port ofa client device; one or more inter-node-link (INL) ports, whichfacilitate communications with one or more of peer information handlingsystem nodes in an n-node system, the n-node system comprising theinformation handling system node and at least one of the one or morepeer information handling system nodes; a data processing component thatprocesses data traffic for transmission via at least one of theplurality of I/O ports or at least one of the plurality of INL ports;and a fabric-level dataset that provides a logical single representationof the LAGs connected to the nodes of the n-node system and issynchronized across active nodes of the n-node system.
 2. Theinformation handling system node of claim 1 wherein the plurality ofinter-node-link ports are configured such that the information handlingsystem node is in a full mesh topology with the one or more peerinformation handling system nodes of the n-node system.
 3. Theinformation handling system node of claim 2 wherein the full meshtopology is a logical full mesh.
 4. The information handling system nodeof claim 2 wherein the information handling system node furthercomprises being configured with one or more Layer 3 interfaces having afabric-level identification that is shared with one or more of theplurality of information handling system nodes in the n-node system. 5.The information handling system node of claim 2 wherein the n-nodesystem comprises information handling system node devices of at leasttwo different types.
 6. The information handling system node of claim 2wherein a LAG is configured to be a member of a virtual local areanetwork (VLAN) that has a VLAN identifier which is common to theinformation handling system node and the at least one of the one or morepeer information handling system node but that is unique to that VLAN.7. The information handling system node of claim 6 wherein the INL portis configured to be a member of an internal Layer 3 INL VLAN defined inthe n-node system.
 8. The information handling system node of claim 7further comprising a routing instance operating on the informationhandling system node to facilitate routing in the n-node system.
 9. An-node system comprising: a plurality of node devices communicativelycoupled via inter-node links (INLs) to facilitate communications betweenone or more node devices from the plurality of node devices in then-node system; at least one of the plurality of node devicescommunicatively coupled via one or more input/output (I/O) ports to aclient device configured with a link aggregation group (LAG); and eachnode device of the plurality of node devices of the n-node systemcomprising a common set of fabric-level data that provides a logicalsingle representation that associates a LAG identifier for the LAG witheach of the at least one of the plurality of node devices thatparticipate in the LAG independent of whether or not the node devicefrom the plurality of node devices participates in the LAG.
 10. Then-node system of claim 9 wherein the plurality of node devices arecommunicatively coupled to each other via inter-node links (INLs) in afull mesh topology.
 11. The n-node system of claim 10 wherein the fullmesh topology is a logical full mesh.
 12. The n-node system of claim 9wherein the common set of fabric-level data is synchronized across atleast active node devices in the n-node system.
 13. The n-node system ofclaim 9 wherein the LAG is configured to be a member of a virtual localarea network (VLAN) and the plurality of node devices of the n-nodesystem associate a common VLAN identifier with each of the ports that isa member of the VLAN using at least some of the common set offabric-level data.
 14. The n-node system of claim 13 further comprisingat least one or more of the nodes being configured with one or moreLayer 3 interfaces and a routing instance operating on at least one ofthe node device of the n-node system to facilitate routing.
 15. Then-node system of claim 14 wherein the INL port is configured to be amember of an internal Layer 3 INL VLAN defined in the n-node system. 16.The n-node LAG system of claim 14 wherein at least one of the nodescomprises a routing instance to facilitate routing between VLANs in then-node system.
 17. The n-node LAG system of claim 9 wherein one of thenodes of the n-node system is configured to be a topology change ownerto coordinate updates to the common set of fabric-level data responsiveto a topology change in the n-node system.
 18. A method of providingcommunications using an n-node system comprising a plurality of nodescommunicatively coupled to each other via inter-node links (INLs), themethod comprising: forming a topology between the nodes of the n-nodesystem; at a fabric level: for each link aggregation group (LAG)spanning a plurality of nodes in the n-node system, a fabric-leveldataset that provides a logical single representation of the LAGsconnected to the nodes of the n-node system in which each LAG has itsown identifier, which is associated with each port in the n-node systemthat participates in that LAG; and synchronizing the fabric-leveldataset one or more tables across at least the nodes in the n-nodesystem that are active so that the each of the active nodes includes acopy of the fabric-level dataset.
 19. The method of claim 18 furthercomprising: for a virtual local area network (VLAN) in the n-nodesystem, associating a common VLAN identifier with each port in then-node system that is a member of that VLAN.
 20. The method of claim 18further comprising the step comprising: responsive to a change in then-node system that affects one or more of the LAGs, updating thefabric-level dataset and synchronizing the fabric-level dataset acrosseach of the nodes in the n-node system that remains active to maintain aconsistent topology of the n-node system.